每日推荐

Bright spots in China's infant milk formula market

October 25, 2019

Although China’s infant milk formula (IMF) sales experienced a period of rapid growth starting in 2000, there has been a slowdown in recent years. Despite this, premium products have been a bright spot, and their high growth may continue as there is a growing preference for them among Chinese consumers. We think lower-tier markets could also be a source of growth as they accounted for 80% of newborns in 2017 and make up the bulk of the total number of maternal and baby product stores.



Industry background: Four stages of China’s IMF industry

China’s IMF industry has undergone four main stages since the market started to open up.

Figure 1: China’s IMF industry
Source: Euromonitor, CICC Research

In the first and second stages, IMF sales nearly tripled from Rmb10bn in 2003 to Rmb27.96bn in 2007, while sales growth also picked up from 12.7% in 2001 to 36.2% in 2007. This may have been due to higher average spending on IMF products and increases in ASP, possibly on the back of a decline in the breastfeeding rate (as measured by the percentage of breast-fed babies that are less than 6 months of age).

Figure 2: Breastfeeding rate in China

Source: CDRF, National Health Commission, CICC Research

The third stage (2008–2013) saw growth slow for sales volume and ASP, while in the fourth stage (2014–2018), the growth rate of overall IMF sales declined to single digits due to a high base for average IMF spending, tighter regulations on prices and the decline in the number of newborns.



Current situation: Growing preference for premium products

While growth in average IMF spending has slowed, sales of premium and super-premium infant formulas have continued to rise. According to Frost & Sullivan, over 2014–2018, premium and super-premium infant formulas registered sales CAGRs of 39.5% and 20.5%, and their combined portion of total IMF sales rose from 22.0% to 37.9%. Given consumers’ growing preference for these products, we think their growth could continue for some time to come.

Figure 3: Sales of general, premium and super-premium infant formulas
Source: Frost & Sullivan, Feihe prospectus, CICC Research

Figure 4: Domestic ASP for all IMF products and for premium and super-premium products
Source: Frost & Sullivan, Feihe prospectus, CICC Research

Domestic IMF companies as well as those from abroad have rolled out super-premium products such as organic and goat infant formulas. Health & Happiness International bought American organic IMF brand Healthy Times in 2015, Wyeth launched its “Illuma” organic formula series in 2017, and Mengniu recently announced its acquisition of Australian organic infant formula maker Bellamy.

Figure 5: Sales of premium and super-premium products for major domestic brands (2018)
Source: Corporate filings, public information, CICC Research

Figure 6: Chinese consumers’ primary reasons for purchasing goat milk formula (2018)
Source: CASS, CICC Research

Figure 7: China’s goat milk formula market sales
Source: CASS, Frost & Sullivan, CICC Research



Potentially greater growth in lower-tier markets

According to data from market research firm Kantar, average spending on infant products in tier-3 and tier-4 cities is two thirds of that in tier-1 and tier-2 cities. We think there could be greater growth potential in lower-tier markets, given that there are more households as well as maternal and baby product stores in tier-3 and tier-4 cities; only 20% of the 17.58mn newborns in 2017 came from upper-tier cities; and disposable income and expenditure in tier-3 and tier-4 cities are growing rapidly. While foreign IMF brands mainly target tier-1 and tier-2 cities, domestic brands focus more on tier-3 and tier-4 markets.

Figure 8: Number of maternal and baby product stores
Source: Nielsen, CICC Research

Figure 9: Number of households (2018)
Source: Nielsen, Euromonitor, CICC Research



For more details, please see our report Domestic players likely to dominate China’s infant milk formula market published in October 2019.



法律声明

一般声明

本报告中的信息均来源于我们认为可靠的已公开资料,但中国国际金融股份有限公司及/或其关联机构(以下统称"中金公司")对这些信息的准确性及完整性不作任何保证。本报告中的信息、意见等均仅供投资者参考之用,不构成所述证券买卖的出价或征价。该等信息、意见并未考虑到获取本报告人员的具体投资目的、财务状况以及特定需求,在任何时候均不构成对任何人的个人推荐。投资者应当对本报告中的信息和意见进行独立评估,并应同时考量各自的投资目的、财务状况和特定需求,必要时就法律、商业、财务、税收等方面咨询专业财务顾问的意见。对依据或者使用本报告所造成的一切后果,中金公司及/或其关联人员均不承担任何法律责任。 

本报告所载的意见、评估及预测仅为本报告出具日的观点和判断。该等意见、评估及预测无需通知即可随时更改。过往的表现亦不应作为日后表现的预示和担保。在不同时期,中金公司可能会发出与本报告所载意见、评估及预测不一致的研究报告。 

中金公司的销售人员、交易人员以及其他专业人士可能会依据不同假设和标准、采用不同的分析方法而口头或书面发表与本报告意见及建议不一致的市场评论和/或交易观点。中金公司没有将此意见及建议向报告所有接收者进行更新的义务。中金公司的资产管理部门、自营部门以及其他投资业务部门可能独立做出与本报告中的意见或建议不一致的投资决策。 

本报告由受香港证券和期货委员会监管的中国国际金融香港证券有限公司于香港提供。香港的投资者若有任何关于中金公司研究报告的问题请直接联系中国国际金融香港证券有限公司的销售交易代表。 

本报告由受新加坡金融管理局监管的中国国际金融(新加坡)有限公司(“中金新加坡”) 于新加坡向符合新加坡《证券期货法》及《财务顾问法》定义下的认可投资者及/或机构投资者提供。提供本报告于此类投资者, 有关财务顾问将无需根据新加坡之《财务顾问法》第36 条就任何利益及/或其代表就任何证券利益进行披露。有关本报告之任何查询,在新加坡获得本报告的人员可向中金新加坡提出。 

本报告由受金融市场行为监管局监管的中国国际金融(英国)有限公司(“中金英国”)于英国提供。本报告有关的投资和服务仅向符合《2000年金融服务和市场法2005年(金融推介)令》第19(5)条、38条、47条以及49条规定的人士提供。本报告并未打算提供给零售客户使用。在其他欧洲经济区国家,本报告向被其本国认定为专业投资者(或相当性质)的人士提供。 

本报告由中国国际金融日本株式会社(“中金日本”)于日本提供,中金日本是在日本关东财务局(日本关东财务局长(金商)第 3235号)注册并受日本法律监管的金融机构。本报告有关的投资产品和服务仅向符合日本《金融商品交易法》第2条31项所规定的专业投资者提供。本报告并未打算提供给日本非专业投资者使用。
本报告亦由中国国际金融股份有限公司向符合日本《金融商品交易法施行令》第17条第3款第1项及《金融商品交易法》第58条第2款但书前段所规定的日本金融机构提供。在该情形下,本报告有关的投资产品和服务仅向日本受监管的金融机构提供。

本报告将依据其他国家或地区的法律法规和监管要求于该国家或地区提供。

特别声明

在法律许可的情况下,中金公司可能与本报告中提及公司正在建立或争取建立业务关系或服务关系,也可能会持有本报告中提及公司所发行的证券头寸并进行交易。因此,投资者应当考虑到中金公司及/或其相关人员可能存在影响本报告观点客观性的潜在利益冲突。投资者请勿将研究报告或相关信息视为投资或其他决定的信赖依据。

与本报告所含具体公司相关的披露信息请访https://research.cicc.com/footer/disclosures,亦可参见近期已发布的关于该等公司的具体研究报告。

中金研究基本评级体系说明:

分析师采用相对评级体系,股票评级分为跑赢行业、中性、跑输行业(定义见下文)。

除了股票评级外,中金公司对覆盖行业的未来市场表现提供行业评级观点,行业评级分为超配、标配、低配(定义见下文)。

我们在此提醒您,中金公司对研究覆盖的股票不提供买入、卖出评级。跑赢行业、跑输行业不等同于买入、卖出。投资者应仔细阅读中金公司研究报告中的所有评级定义。请投资者仔细阅读研究报告全文,以获取比较完整的观点与信息,不应仅仅依靠评级来推断结论。在任何情形下,评级(或研究观点)都不应被视为或作为投资建议。投资者买卖证券或其他金融产品的决定应基于自身实际具体情况(比如当前的持仓结构)及其他需要考虑的因素。

股票评级定义:
i. 跑赢行业(OUTPERFORM):未来6~12个月,分析师预计个股表现超过同期其所属的中金行业指数;
ii. 中性(NEUTRAL):未来6~12个月,分析师预计个股表现与同期其所属的中金行业指数相比持平;
iii. 跑输行业(UNDERPERFORM):未来6~12个月,分析师预计个股表现不及同期其所属的中金行业指数。

行业评级定义:
i. 超配(OVERWEIGHT):未来6~12个月,分析师预计某行业会跑赢大盘10%以上;
ii. 标配(EQUAL-WEIGHT):未来6~12个月,分析师预计某行业表现与大盘的关系在-10%与10%之间;
iii. 低配(UNDERWEIGHT):未来6~12个月,分析师预计某行业会跑输大盘10%以上。

研究报告评级分布可从https://research.cicc.com/footer/disclosures 获悉。

本报告的版权仅为中金公司所有,未经书面许可任何机构和个人不得以任何形式转发、翻版、复制、刊登、发表或引用。 
回到顶部